Rotein conformations onto a AKT inhibitor 2 single parameterized curve, we define a free energy G ?along this curve. Although the protein conformation is still represented in a 642-dimensional coordinate space, the G ?here 1317923 is a onedimensional function of the reduced curve parameter a only. Unlike the multidimensional free energy in the conventional string method [21,24] as a function of all the coarse coordinates, here the G ?effectively integrates all degrees of freedom orthogonal to the curve, and properly incorporates factors such as the cross section of the transition tube [26]. Recent studies [27] demonstrated that such one-dimensional free energies are less sensitive to the choice of the representative (coarse) coordinates, and more faithfully characterize the transition than the high-dimensional free energies do. Methods have been recently proposed to calculate the onedimensional free energy profiles in a multidimensional conformational space. From confined simulations in Voronoi cells, e.g., the free energy can be obtained from the frequencies of the collisions at the cell MedChemExpress 125-65-5 boundaries [26,27]. Here we adopted a new approach that generalizes the 1D umbrella sampling to compute the free energy profile along a curve. By invoking a local linear approximation, the biasing potential in each umbrella window acts only along the tangent direction of the curve, with all other directions in the conformational space unrestrained. The approximation is valid if the curve is sufficiently smooth such that its tangent direction only changes slightly over the distance between neighboring windows. The umbrella sampling can be combined with Hamiltonian replica exchange [38], as adopted in this study, to enhance the efficiency. The method presented here for the calculation of 1D conformational free energies can be conveniently implemented, and should be generally applicable to other systems. In the meantime it would also be desired to validate the method on simpler systems with clearer conclusions to compare. Our calculated free energy profile indicates that without the bound ligand, the closed conformation of AdK is not metastable, which is also consistent with our unrestrained simulations here. By the end of all unrestrained simulations, only one (C8) did not approach the open state. Even in this simulation (C8), the proteinstill deviated from the crystal structure by some amount. We note that a single free energy minimum near the open state and an unfavorable closed conformation were also recently reported by Matsunaga et al. for the ligand-free AdK [18], and are consistent with previous simulation studies [13,17] as well. The ,13 kcal/ mol free energy obtained here for the closed state is similar to the value of ,20 kBT (,12 kcal/mol) from the string-method calculation by Matsunaga et al. [18], although other simulations using different order parameters reported a wide range of values for this free energy difference in the ligand-free AdK. We note that because the closed state is not near a local minimum, its exact position along the order parameter might be somewhat ambiguous, which may give rise to some variation in the assigned free energy value. Employing single-molecule FRET technique, Hanson et al. monitored the distance between two dyes attached to the LID and CORE domains, respectively, of an AdK mutant [15]. Using advanced statistical analysis, it was concluded that for the ligandfree AdK, the closed state is metastable and in fact even more favorabl.Rotein conformations onto a single parameterized curve, we define a free energy G ?along this curve. Although the protein conformation is still represented in a 642-dimensional coordinate space, the G ?here 1317923 is a onedimensional function of the reduced curve parameter a only. Unlike the multidimensional free energy in the conventional string method [21,24] as a function of all the coarse coordinates, here the G ?effectively integrates all degrees of freedom orthogonal to the curve, and properly incorporates factors such as the cross section of the transition tube [26]. Recent studies [27] demonstrated that such one-dimensional free energies are less sensitive to the choice of the representative (coarse) coordinates, and more faithfully characterize the transition than the high-dimensional free energies do. Methods have been recently proposed to calculate the onedimensional free energy profiles in a multidimensional conformational space. From confined simulations in Voronoi cells, e.g., the free energy can be obtained from the frequencies of the collisions at the cell boundaries [26,27]. Here we adopted a new approach that generalizes the 1D umbrella sampling to compute the free energy profile along a curve. By invoking a local linear approximation, the biasing potential in each umbrella window acts only along the tangent direction of the curve, with all other directions in the conformational space unrestrained. The approximation is valid if the curve is sufficiently smooth such that its tangent direction only changes slightly over the distance between neighboring windows. The umbrella sampling can be combined with Hamiltonian replica exchange [38], as adopted in this study, to enhance the efficiency. The method presented here for the calculation of 1D conformational free energies can be conveniently implemented, and should be generally applicable to other systems. In the meantime it would also be desired to validate the method on simpler systems with clearer conclusions to compare. Our calculated free energy profile indicates that without the bound ligand, the closed conformation of AdK is not metastable, which is also consistent with our unrestrained simulations here. By the end of all unrestrained simulations, only one (C8) did not approach the open state. Even in this simulation (C8), the proteinstill deviated from the crystal structure by some amount. We note that a single free energy minimum near the open state and an unfavorable closed conformation were also recently reported by Matsunaga et al. for the ligand-free AdK [18], and are consistent with previous simulation studies [13,17] as well. The ,13 kcal/ mol free energy obtained here for the closed state is similar to the value of ,20 kBT (,12 kcal/mol) from the string-method calculation by Matsunaga et al. [18], although other simulations using different order parameters reported a wide range of values for this free energy difference in the ligand-free AdK. We note that because the closed state is not near a local minimum, its exact position along the order parameter might be somewhat ambiguous, which may give rise to some variation in the assigned free energy value. Employing single-molecule FRET technique, Hanson et al. monitored the distance between two dyes attached to the LID and CORE domains, respectively, of an AdK mutant [15]. Using advanced statistical analysis, it was concluded that for the ligandfree AdK, the closed state is metastable and in fact even more favorabl.